Animal Reproduction (AR)
https://www.animal-reproduction.org/article/doi/10.21451/1984-3143-AR1007
Animal Reproduction (AR)
Conference Paper

COST-Action GEMINI and EPICONCEPT: what we learned after 8 years?

Ann Van Soom, Alireza Fazeli

Downloads: 0
Views: 567

Abstract

Scientific societies have a major role in facilitating and disseminating scientific discoveries. Here, we are all members of societies related to reproductive biology, such as AETE (European Association of Embryo Transfer), SRF (Society for Reproduction and Fertility) or ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology). However, many of you may be unfamiliar with COST Actions. These are atypical, EU-funded temporary societies, that can have a huge impact upon the lives and careers of their members. The objective of the present paper was to capture the influence that one specific COST Action, EPICONCEPT, and to a lesser extent also the earlier COST Action GEMINI, has had on European scientists involved in animal reproduction and embryo transfer. We discuss the intrinsic value of belonging to EPICONCEPT, we focus on how EPICONCEPT advanced the careers of the scientists involved and the lessons learned. We conclude that such specific short-lived societies as granted by COST can be the basis of permanent collaborative ties and networking within Europe. Moreover, EPICONCEPT has been a very useful tool to raise awareness about epigenetics among animal scientists and breeders.

Keywords

COST, epigenetics, periconception environment, researcher.

References

Anckaert E, Fair T. 2015. DNA methylation reprogramming during oogenesis and interference by reproductive technologies: studies in mouse and bovine models. Reprod Fertil Dev, 27:739-754.

Bahr JM. 2008. Are scientific societies serving the need of graduate and postdoctoral students? Reprod Fertil Dev, 20:19-22.

Barker DJ, Winter PD, Osmond C, Margetts B, Simmonds SJ. 1989. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet, 2:577-580.

Barker DJ. 1995. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. Br Med J, 311:171-174.

Brevini T A L, Pennarossa G, Maffei S, Gandolfi F. 2015. Phenotype switching through epigenetic conversion. Reprod Fertil Dev, 27:776-783.

Burkitt M, Walker D, Romano DM, Fazeli A. 2011. Computational modelling of maternal interactions with spermatozoa: potentials and prospects. Reprod Fertil Dev, 23:976-989.

Farin CE, Farmer WT, Farin PW. 2010. Pregnancy recognition and abnormal offspring syndrome in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev, 22:75-87.

Fleming TP, Watkins AJ, Sun C, Velazquez MA, Smyth NR, Eckert JJ. 2015. Do little embryos make big decisions? How maternal dietary protein restriction can permanently change an embryo's potential, affecting adult health. Reprod Fertil Dev, 27:684-692.

González-Recio O, Ugarte E, Bach A. 2012. Transgenerational effect of maternal lactation during pregnancy: a Holstein cow model. PLoS One, 7:e51816.

Grace KS, Sinclair KD. 2009. Assisted reproductive technology, epigenetics, and long-term health: a developmental time bomb still ticking. Semin Reprod Med, 27:409-416.

Gutierrez-Adan A, White CR, Van Soom A, Mann MRW. 2014. Why we should not select the faster embryo: lessons from mice and cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev, 27:765-775.

Holt WV, Lloyd RE. 2010. Sperm storage in the vertebrate female reproductive tract: how does it work so well? Theriogenology, 73:713-722.

Mossa F, Carter F, Walsh SW, Kenny DA, Smith GW, Ireland JL, Hildebrandt TB, Lonergan P, Ireland JJ, Evans AC. 2013. Maternal undernutrition in cows impairs ovarian and cardiovascular systems in their offspring. Biol Reprod, 88:92. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.

O'Doherty AM, McGettigan P. 2014. Epigenetic processes in the male germline. Reprod Fertil Dev, 27:725-738.

Opsomer G, Van Eetvelde M, Kamal M, Van Soom A. 2016. Epidemiological evidence for metabolic programming in dairy cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev, 29:52-57.

Owen CM, Segars JH Jr. 2009. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Semin Reprod Med, 27:417-428.

Rosenfeld CS. 2010. Animal models to study environmental epigenetics. Biol Reprod, 82:473-488.

Salvaing J., Li Y., Beaujean N., O'Neill C. 2014. Determinants of valid measurements of global changes in 5ʹ -methylcytosine and 5ʹ -hydroxymethylcytosine by immunolocalisation in the early embryo. Reprod Fertil Dev, 27:755-764.

Sinclair KD, Singh R. 2007. Modelling the developmental origins of health and disease in the early embryo. Theriogenology, 67:43-53.

Van Soom A, Mijten P, Van Vlaenderen I, Van den Branden J, Mahmoudzadeh AR, de Kruif A. 1994. Birth of double-muscled Belgian Blue calves after transfer of in vitro produced embryos into dairy cattle. Theriogenology, 41:855-867.

Van Soom A, Vandaele L, Peelman LJ, Goossens K, Fazeli A. 2010. Modeling the interaction of gametes and embryos with the maternal genital tract: from in vivo to in silico. Theriogenology, 73:828-837.

Van Soom A, Vandaele L, Goossens K, Heras S, Wydooghe E, Kamal MM, Van Eetvelde M, Opsomer G, Peelman L. 2013. Epigenetics and the periconception environment in ruminants. Proc Belg Royal Acad Med, 2:1-23.

Van Soom A, Peelman L, Holt WV, Fazeli A. 2014. An introduction to epigenetics as the link between genotype and environment: a personal view. Reprod Domest Anim, 49(suppl. 3):2-10.

Velazquez MA. . 2015. Impact of maternal malnutrition during the periconceptional period on mammalian preimplantation embryo development. Domest Anim Endocrinol, 51:27-45.

Walker S.K, Hartwich KM, Seamark R. 1996. The production of unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: concepts and challenges. Theriogenology, 45:111-120.

Willadsen SM, Janzen RE, McAlister RJ, Shea BF, Hamilton G, McDermand D. 1991. The viability of late morulae and blastocysts produced by nuclear transplantation in cattle. Theriogenology ,35:161-170. Young LE, Sinclair KD, Wilmut I. 1998. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod, 3:155-163.

5b72dfd70e8825f44f8068a8 animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections