Animal Reproduction (AR)
https://www.animal-reproduction.org/article/doi/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0174
Animal Reproduction (AR)
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Cooling extender choice modulates the efficacy of freezing extenders for boar sperm cryopreservation

Nina Miglioranza Vellozo; Gabriel Augusto Monteiro; Pedro Henrique de Oliveira Baldini; Rogério Araújo de Almeida Filho; José Antônio Dell’Aqua Junior; Frederico Ozanam Papa; Daniella Jorge de Moura; Eunice Oba

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2025-0174 Anim Reprod, vol.23, n3, e20250174, 2026
PDF
Downloads: 0
Views: 20

Abstract

Boar semen cryopreservation is limited by high sperm sensitivity, with the cooling extender and holding time representing critical steps. However, the interplay between transport and freezing extenders remains poorly elucidated. This study evaluated the main effects and the interaction between two cooling extender (BTS and BSUI®) and two freezing extenders (TRIS® and BBB®) on post-thaw boar semen quality. Ejaculates from 10 boars were processed in a 2x2 factorial design (BTS/TRIS, BTS/BBB, BSUI/TRIS, BSUI/BBB). Sperm kinetics (CASA) and plasma membrane integrity (PMI) were assessed at pre-centrifugation, post-centrifugation, and post-thaw time points. At the post-thaw evaluation, no significant interaction was observed between transport and freezing extenders (P > 0.05), indicating that these factors act independently. Regarding the main effects, the BSUI® cooling extender resulted in superior kinetic performance compared to BTS (P < 0.05). Independently, the TRIS® freezing extender yielded higher motility and membrane integrity than BBB® (P < 0.05). Consequently, the sequential combination of BSUI/TRIS presented the highest absolute kinetic values (Total Motility 63.3%; Progressive Motility 36.1%) due to the cumulative effect of the most efficient extenders. In conclusion, the cooling extender influences post-thaw quality independently of the freezing extender. The BSUI/TRIS sequence optimized post-thaw kinetics through an additive effect. Therefore, protocol optimization should focus on selecting the most efficient extender for each isolated stage of the process.

Keywords

boar semen, cryopreservation, cooling extender, extender interaction, cryotolerance

References

Anton M. Egg yolk: structures, functionalities and processes. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93(12):2871-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6247. PMid:23716191.

Arraztoa CC, Miragaya MH, Chaves MG, Trasorras VL, Gambarotta MC, Neild DM. Porcine sperm vitrification II: spheres method. Andrologia. 2017;49(8):e12738. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12738. PMid:27859529.

Azevedo HC, Blackburn HD, Lozada-Soto EA, Spiller SF, Purdy PH. Enhancing evaluation of bull fertility through multivariate analysis of sperm. J Dairy Sci. 2024;107(12):11774-84. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25163. PMid:39343204.

Bailey JL, Lessard C, Jacques J, Brèque C, Dobrinski I, Zeng W, Galantino-Homer HL. Cryopreservation of boar semen and its future importance to the industry. Theriogenology. 2008;70(8):1251-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.014. PMid:18653225.

Boni R, Ruggiero R, De Luca F, Serritella ML, Di Palma T, Cecchini Gualandi S. Repeatability of selected parameters related to stallion sperm quality and cryotolerance. Animals. 2025;15(19):2805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192805. PMid:41096400.

Caamaño JN, Tamargo C, Parrilla I, Martínez-Pastor F, Padilla L, Salman A, Fueyo C, Fernández Á, Merino MJ, Iglesias T, Hidalgo CO. Post-thaw sperm quality and functionality in the autochthonous pig breed gochu asturcelta. Animals. 2021;11(7):1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071885. PMid:34202862.

Colégio Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal – CBRA. Manual para exame andrológico e avaliação do sêmen animal. 3. ed. Belo Horizonte: CBRA; 2013.

Dell’Aqua JA, Papa FO, Alvarenga MA, Zahn FS. Effects of warming rate on sperm parameters and of insemination site and dose on the fertility of equine frozen semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2001;68:344-6.

Dubé C, Beaulieu M, Reyes-Moreno C, Guillemette C, Bailey JL. Boar sperm storage capacity of BTS and Androhep Plus: viability, motility, capacitation, and tyrosine phosphorylation. Theriogenology. 2004;62(5):874-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.12.006. PMid:15251239.

Hancock J, Hovell G. The collection of boar semen. Vet Rec. 1959;71:664–665.

Harrison RAP, Vickers SE. Use of fluorescent probes to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;88(1):343-52. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0880343. PMid:1690300.

Juarez JD, Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Roca J. Boar semen can tolerate rapid cooling rates prior to freezing. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011;23(5):681-90. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD10216. PMid:21635817.

Li J, Barranco I, Tvarijonaviciute A, Molina MF, Martinez EA, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Parrilla I, Roca J. Seminal plasma antioxidants are directly involved in boar sperm cryotolerance. Theriogenology. 2018;107:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.10.035. PMid:29128698.

Malcervelli DM, Torres P, Suhevic JF, Cisale H, Fischman ML. Effect of different glycerol concentrations on phosphatidylserine translocation and mitochondrial membrane potential in chilled boar spermatozoa. Cryobiology. 2020;95:97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.05.012. PMid:32473150.

Monteiro GA, Freitas-Dell’Aqua CP, Guasti PN, Dell’Aqua JA Jr, Alvarenga MA, Landim FC, Papa FO. Comparison of apoptotic cells between cryopreserved ejaculated sperm and epididymal sperm in stallions. J Equine Vet Sci. 2013;33(7):552-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2012.08.010.

Moreira SSJ, Santos RP, Pereira Bezerra LG, Pereira AG, Nascimento Luz NR, Brasil AV, Cavalcanti TP, Oliveira MF, Kitamura Martins SMM, Andrade AFC, Silva AR. Retrospective analysis of sperm metrics in fresh ejaculates of collared peccaries presenting contrasting semen freezability. Cryobiology. 2025;121:105324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2025.105324. PMid:40976224.

Oldenhof H, Wolkers WF, Sieme H. Cryopreservation of Semen from Domestic Livestock: Bovine, Equine, and Porcine Sperm. In: Wolkers WF, Oldenhof H, editors. Cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols. New York: Humana; 2021. p. 365-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0783-1_15.

Orrego MT, Melian SI, Montenegro J, Cimato AN, Cisale H, Piehl LL. Boar sperm protein tyrosine phosphorylation in the presence of egg yolk soluble and low density lipoprotein fractions during cooling. Theriogenology. 2019;123:151-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.09.031. PMid:30308391.

Santos RP, Moreira SSJ, Bezerra LGP, Matos YG, Luz NRN, Brito PAP, Jorge-Neto PN, Silva AR. Short-term storage of collared peccary semen in a transport container at 5 °C using different extenders. Reprod Domest Anim. 2025;60(3):e70036. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.70036. PMid:40052759.

Schäfer J, Waberski D, Jung M, Schulze M. Impact of holding and equilibration time on post-thaw quality of shipped boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2017;187:109-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.10.014. PMid:29107386.

Souza ALP, Lima GL, Peixoto GCX, de Souza Castelo T, Oliveira MGC, de Paula VV, Silva AR. Sperm characteristics following freezing in extenders supplemented with whole egg yolk and different concentrations of low-density lipoproteins in the collared peccary (Pecari tajacu). Reprod Biol. 2015;15(4):223-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2015.10.006. PMid:26679163.

Torres MA, Monteiro MS, Passarelli MS, Papa FO, Dell’Aqua JA Jr, Alvarenga MA, Martins SMMK, de Andrade AFC. The ideal holding time for boar semen is 24 h at 17 °C prior to short-cryopreservation protocols. Cryobiology. 2019;86:58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.12.004. PMid:30557556.

Vadnais ML, Roberts KP. Effects of seminal plasma on cooling-induced capacitative changes in boar sperm. J Androl. 2007;28(3):416-22. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.106.001826. PMid:17192595.

Waberski D, Meding S, Dirksen G, Weitze KF, Leiding C, Hahn R. Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 1994;36(1-2):145-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(94)90061-2.

Wasilewska K, Fraser L. Boar variability in sperm cryo-tolerance after cooling of semen in different long-term extenders at various temperatures. Anim Reprod Sci. 2017;185:161-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.08.016. PMid:28867410.

Whaley D, Damyar K, Witek RP, Mendoza A, Alexander M, Lakey JR. Cryopreservation: an overview of principles and cell-specific considerations. Cell Transplant. 2021;30:963689721999617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689721999617. PMid:33757335.

Yang C-H, Wu T-W, Cheng F-P, Wang J-H, Wu J-T. Effects of different cryoprotectants and freezing methods on post-thaw boar semen quality. Reprod Biol. 2016;16(1):41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2015.12.008. PMid:26952752.

Yeste M, Rodríguez‐Gil JE, Bonet S. Artificial insemination with frozen‐thawed boar sperm. Mol Reprod Dev. 2017;84(9):802-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22840. PMid:28608609.

Yeste M. Recent advances in boar sperm cryopreservation: state of the art and current perspectives. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50(Suppl 2):71-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12569. PMid:26174922.

Yeste M. Sperm cryopreservation update: cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs. Theriogenology. 2016;85(1):47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.047. PMid:26506124.

Zhang B, Wang Y, Wu C, Qiu S, Chen X, Cai B, Xie H. Freeze-thawing impairs the motility, plasma membrane integrity and mitochondria function of boar spermatozoa through generating excessive ROS. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02804-1. PMid:33752649.
 

Submitted date:
11/14/2025

Accepted date:
04/13/2026

6a5a5b61a953952a627c475b animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads
1984-3143 (Electronic) 1806-9614 (Printed)
Anim Reprod ©2026 All rights reserved for this website content. Articles follow their own licenses.

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections