Animal Reproduction (AR)
Animal Reproduction (AR)
Thematic Section: 34th Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Embryo Technology Society (SBTE)

How can we improve embryo production and pregnancy outcomes of Holstein embryos produced in vitro? (12 years of practical results at a California dairy farm)

Daniela Garcia Borges Demetrio; Eduardo Benedetti; Clarice Garcia Borges Demetrio; Julio Fonseca; Mayara Oliveira; Alvaro Magalhaes; Ricarda Maria dos Santos

Downloads: 3
Views: 872


Abstract: Genomic evaluations have revolutionized dairy cattle breeding, and the demand for embryos produced from very young heifers with high genetic merit has increased over time. The combination of low oocyte recovery, young age of donors, and milk production status can make the in vitro embryo production (IVP) of Holstein cattle incredibly challenging. Several factors need to be coordinated to obtain a live calf from an IVP embryo, but the quality of the oocyte at the start of the process is one of the key factors. Aspects related to oocyte quality, laboratory quality control, embryo quality and recipient selection are addressed here, based on the measures that the RuAnn Genetics Laboratory (Riverdale, California, USA) adopted in the last 12 years, with the goal of improving production of live, healthy calves from Holstein embryos. Follicular wave synchronization and stimulation with follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) is necessary to improve oocyte quality and consequently embryo production. Laboratory quality control and the use of high-quality supplies are essential to reduce variability in production and facilitate identification of other factors that might interfere with embryo production. High pregnancy rates can be achieved with good quality embryos selected at optimal time and stage of development, transferred by an experienced embryo transfer (ET) technician, to well managed recipients 7 or 8 days after estrus. Attention to detail at every step of the process is crucial to success.


embryo, Holstein, in vitro production, pregnancy, recipient


Antunes G, Marques A, Santos P, Chaveiro A, Moreira da Silva F. Atlas do ovócito e do embrião bovino: breves noções da fisiologia da reprodução em bovinos. Lisboa: Principia; 2008. p. 1-120.

Collett D. Modelling binary data. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2002.

Demetrio D. The influence of embryo and recipient selection on bovine IVF embryo pregnancy outcome. Proceedings of the 2019 AETA & CETA/ACTE Joint Annual Convention; 2019; Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA. Champaign, IL: American Embryo Transfer Association; 2019.

Demetrio D, Magalhães A, Oliveira M, Santos RM, Chebel RC. Invivo-derived embryo pregnancy rates at Maddox Dairy from 2008 to 2018. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2019;32(2):130-1.

Demetrio D, Wehrman M. American Embryo Transfer Association Statistical Committee report (2017 data). In: Proceedings of the 2018 AETA & CETA/ACTE Joint Annual Convention; 2018; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Champaign, IL: American Embryo Transfer Association; 2018.

Demetrio D, Wehrman M. American Embryo Transfer Association Statistical Committee report (2018 data). Proceedings of the 2019 AETA & CETA/ACTE Joint Annual Convention; 2019, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA. Champaign, IL: American Embryo Transfer Association; 2019.

Gardner DK. Lactate production by the mammalian blastocyst: manipulating the microenvironment for uterine implantation and invasion? BioEssays. 2015;37(4):364-71. PMid:25619853.

Gardner DK, Kelley RL. Impact of the IVF laboratory environment on human preimplantation embryo phenotype. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8(4):418-35. PMid:28610639.

Gardner DK, Lane M. Towards a single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6(4):470-81. PMid:12831597.

Hansen PJ. Implications of assisted reproductive technologies for pregnancy outcomes in mammals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2020;8(1):395-413. PMid:32069434.

Hinde J, Demetrio CGB. Overdipersion: models and estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1998;27(2):151-70.

Kanagawa H, Shimohira I, Saitoh N. Manual of bovine embryo transfer. Tokyo: Japan Livestock Technology Association; 1995.

Leroy JL, Rizos D, Sturmey R, Bossaert P, Gutierrez-Adan A, Van Hoeck V, Valckx S, Bols PE. Intrafollicular conditions as a major link between maternal metabolism and oocyte quality: a focus on dairy cow fertility. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011;24(1):1-12. PMid:22394712.

Lonergan P, Fair T. Maturation of oocytes in vitro. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4(1):255-68. PMid:26566159.

Molenberghs G, Verbeke G, Demétrio CGB. An extended random-effects approach to modeling repeated, overdispersed count data. Lifetime Data Anal. 2007;13(4):513-31. PMid:17999182.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019 [cited 2020 May 10]. Available from:

Ribeiro ES, Gomes G, Greco LF, Cerri RLA, Vieira-Neto A, Monteiro PLJ Jr, Lima FS, Bisinotto RS, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Carryover effect of postpartum inflammatory diseases on developmental biology and fertility in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(3):2201-20. PMid:26723113.

Sirard MA. 40 years of bovine IVF in the new genomic selection context. Reproduction. 2018;156(1):R1-7. PMid:29636405.

Wrenzycki C. In vitro culture systems: how far are we from optimal conditions? Anim Reprod. 2016;13(3):279-82.

5f4656870e882560687dcf47 animreprod Articles
Links & Downloads

Anim Reprod

Share this page
Page Sections